Skip to content

ALORIA ENTERPRISE EVALUATION KIT

A buyer-ready starting package.

Use this page with technology, AI governance, security, procurement and business stakeholders to qualify ARE or AGCT before a pilot or production commitment.

CompanyAloria
Primary contactjovan@aloria.mx
FlagshipsARE + AGCT
EngagementEvaluation → Pilot → Deployment

01 · PRODUCT FIT

ARE

Autonomous Revenue Engine

Governed autonomous revenue operations across market/account signals, research, qualification, offer construction, controlled action and evidence.

  • Availability: enterprise evaluation
  • Evidence: technical diligence available
  • Key controls: authority, identity, policy, audit/evidence
AGCT

AI Governance Control Tower

AI inventory, risk, policies, controls, approvals/exceptions and executive evidence in one governance operating layer.

  • Availability: enterprise evaluation
  • Evidence: public demo + technical diligence
  • Public demo uses representative synthetic data
Product page →

02 · ENGAGEMENT STAGES

Evaluation3-10 business days planning envelope

Fit, architecture, walkthrough and evidence review.

Exit:

Bounded use case, owner, prerequisites and go/no-go.

Scoped pilot4-8 weeks after prerequisites

One workflow, defined data/integrations, controls and acceptance criteria.

Exit:

Acceptance evidence + scale/reshape/stop decision.

Enterprise deploymentScoped after pilot / diligence

Production identity, data, operations, support and commercial closure.

Exit:

Signed scope + closed prerequisites + production acceptance.

Planning envelopes are starting points, not delivery commitments. Final schedule depends on scope, access, integrations and buyer approvals.

03 · BUYER INPUTS

What Aloria needs to evaluate fit.

  • Operating problem and accountable owner
  • Target users / decision owners
  • Authoritative systems and data sources
  • Desired AI authority / human approval model
  • Security, regulatory and evidence requirements
  • Success and stop criteria

04 · ALORIA OUTPUTS

What the buyer should expect.

  • Product-fit and architecture hypothesis
  • Workflow + authority/control map
  • Integration assumptions and open dependencies
  • Relevant public/private diligence evidence
  • Pilot acceptance plan when appropriate
  • Scale / reshape / stop recommendation

05 · ACCEPTANCE FRAMEWORK

Functional

Does the bounded workflow perform the agreed tasks?

Authority

Are AI actions and human approvals explicit and enforced?

Integration

Do required systems/data behave within the pilot scope?

Evidence

Can decisions, approvals and execution be inspected?

Security

Are buyer-specific security prerequisites understood and closed for scope?

Business workflow

Do agreed process metrics justify scale, reshape or stop?

06 · TRUST & DILIGENCE

Inspect evidence before commitment.

07 · DESIGN PARTNER

Early use cases have a defined evidence path.

Design Partner evidence is private by default. Named logos, metrics, quotes and case studies require separate authorization after the evidence exists and can be substantiated.

Design Partner program →

08 · DECISION RECORD

Use case: ______________________________________________

Owner: _________________________________________________

Primary product: ________________________________________

Acceptance criteria: ____________________________________

Known dependencies: _____________________________________

Decision: □ Proceed to pilot   □ Reshape   □ Stop