Skip to content

ALORIA EVIDENCE CENTER

Proof should get stronger as the buyer gets closer.

Aloria separates product capability, engineering evidence, deployment evidence, market exposure and customer outcomes. A product page, marketplace listing or asking price is never treated as proof of production readiness or market value.

EVIDENCE TAXONOMY

Five layers. Different confidence.

Commercial conversations should not collapse these layers into a single “ready” badge.

01

Public product evidence

Problem model, workflow, governance boundaries, representative architecture and any explicitly public product proof.

02

Engineering evidence

Build, test, security, architecture, dependency, release and control evidence reviewed when available.

03

Deployment evidence

Identity, integrations, environment, data boundaries and operational dependencies verified for a specific buyer context.

04

Market / diligence evidence

Marketplace exposure, transaction packaging and substantive buyer questions — without inferring valuation, offer or willingness to pay.

05

Customer outcome evidence

Actual usage and outcomes only after they exist, can be substantiated and are authorized for publication.

EVIDENCE CHAIN

Claim → control → evidence → diligence artifact.

The website is an index to evidence, not a substitute for product-specific technical review.

  1. 01
    CLAIM

    A precise product, control or readiness statement.

  2. 02
    CONTROL

    The architecture, policy, boundary or mechanism that should make the claim true.

  3. 03
    EVIDENCE

    Source, test, audit, release or public proof that can support the control.

  4. 04
    DILIGENCE ARTIFACT

    The buyer-facing item used to review scope, limitations and transfer requirements.

PORTFOLIO EVIDENCE MATRIX

One portfolio. Different evidence states.

The broader product portfolio remains distinct from the four assets currently exposed in the strategic acquisition market. Evidence dates below describe the last corporate evidence review, not a promise that no product work happened afterward.

ARE

Autonomous Revenue Engine

Revenue AI

FLAGSHIP
Commercial integrity remediationSource candidate / P0 remediation requiredCorporate evidence reviewed 2026-10-10

The October 9 Customer Zero code review identified synthetic pipeline stages and inadequate proof of live sending, approval and payment events. No real autonomous sales, provider receipts or realized revenue are verified.

  • Source architecture and commercial workflow modules exist
  • Customer Zero review recorded critical authorization and revenue-evidence gaps
  • No buyer-live autonomous selling is claimed
AGCT

AI Governance Control Tower

AI Governance

FLAGSHIP
Active productizationPublic demo + technical diligenceCorporate evidence reviewed 2026-08-23

AGCT has a public executive showcase and live interactive demo using representative synthetic data, plus ongoing technical productization in the private product repository.

  • Public interactive application available
  • Public dashboard screenshot and documented demo flow available
  • Synthetic-data demo scope and non-certification limitations explicitly disclosed
AEOS

Enterprise AI Enablement OS

AI Transformation

Transferable software; external activation openSource code and buyer diligenceCorporate evidence reviewed 2026-10-10

Next.js API, governed agent generation and optional durable PostgREST exist; the latest technical promotion remains in a draft PR and buyer-live runtime is not independently verified.

  • Enterprise API and specialist agent workflow source
  • Reference and real execution mode separation
  • Buyer installation and identity requirements remain open
DOC

Docent Live

Education AI

Advanced source branch; physical proof openSource and enterprise-turnkey candidateCorporate evidence reviewed 2026-10-10

Docent enterprise source branch includes PostgreSQL, OIDC and LTI modules but PR #1 is not merged and its physical certification campaign is pending.

  • Educational product interface and backend modules exist
  • Advanced features isolated on a source branch
  • External providers and institutional flows require validation
REF

RefurbIQ

IT Procurement Intelligence

Functional source; commercial validation openSource and release-candidate diligenceCorporate evidence reviewed 2026-10-10

Case service implements durable tenant-scoped operations and decision-pack generation; buyer transfer package exists in a non-main release candidate, but actual production customer proof remains open.

  • ProcurementCaseService implements cases and approvals
  • Decision Pack generator records assumptions and evidence gaps
  • No verified real savings or paying customers
LIC

LicitaIQ

Opportunity Intelligence

Active productizationProduct + commercial test evidenceCorporate evidence reviewed 2026-10-10

Expanded procurement source and decision modules have reproducible engineering tests. No authorized buyer-live government source runtime, production deployment or completed external certification is claimed.

  • Fail-closed AI production-contract test recorded
  • Buyer-friendly instrumentation validation recorded
  • Commercial assertion tests recorded
PMO

PMO Intelligence Suite

Portfolio Intelligence

Evidence refresh pendingDemo product / production gap disclosedCorporate evidence reviewed 2026-10-10

PMO has a functioning preview and a real PostgreSQL connectivity/least-privilege probe. Tenant RLS, enterprise identity journeys and commercial payments remain explicitly unverified; evaluation is not buyer-live SaaS certification.

  • Demo role and audit/evidence controls documented
  • Build/smoke/E2E validation commands documented
  • Server-side identity and persistence production gap explicitly documented
APS

Aloria Prospect Studio

Commercial Intelligence

Active productizationProduct history + AI mission controlCorporate evidence reviewed 2026-10-10

Prospect Studio has a deployed product baseline and controlled research/demo workflows; live outbound outreach and commercial conversions are not inferred from draft or sandbox adapters.

  • AI mission-control product work recorded
  • Product-shell simplification recorded
  • Evidence-backed commercial research model documented

COMMERCIALIZATION STATUS

4 enterprise software/IP assets are active on a strategic acquisition marketplace.

This supports commercialization intent, transaction preparation and external market exposure. It does not establish a market valuation, willingness to pay, revenue, adoption, PMF, IOI, LOI, offer or completed acquisition.

AGCT
AI Governance Control Tower & AI Security IPPublic product proof + technical diligence
Qualified diligence available
PMO
AI-Native PMO & Portfolio Intelligence IPActive marketplace asset; product lineage advanced, evidence refresh required
Qualified diligence available
ARE
Governed Autonomous Revenue Execution PlatformAdvanced source product; external execution blocked pending P0 remediation
Qualified diligence available
AEOS
AI Enablement OS / Governance IPEnterprise API v1 + buyer handoff / diligence package documented
Qualified diligence available
Inspect asset-level market and transfer readiness →

MARKET SIGNAL · BUYER DILIGENCE

Public market exposure has progressed to substantive buyer diligence.

Substantive acquisition diligence has been initiated by a prospective strategic buyer following independent review of an Aloria product, the Aloria website and a public product demo.

This is evidence of buyer diligence only. It is not represented as an IOI, LOI, offer, accepted valuation, revenue, customer adoption or completed transaction.

Sanitized diligence categories

  • Identity & access
  • Auditability
  • AI governance
  • Security
  • IP ownership
  • Integrations
  • Transferability
  • Buyer fit

DILIGENCE POLICY

Private repositories stay private. Relevant evidence can still be reviewed.

Aloria does not expose private source repositories merely to create marketing credibility. Qualified buyers can request product-appropriate architecture, security, testing, deployment, governance, IP and transfer evidence subject to scope and confidentiality.

During a product review we can qualify

  • Architecture and integration fit
  • Identity, tenancy and permission model
  • AI provider and data boundary
  • Testing, security and release evidence
  • Human authority and control points
  • IP / dependency and transfer scope
  • Known gaps and external dependencies
Request an evidence-led diligence review →